Posted on

Outrageously Bad Reporting

Authorities toughen laws for Victorian drivers

Outrageously Bad Reporting

Don’t get me wrong, I read The Age (digital version) virtually every day and always find one or more well researched and written articles. These provide insight into world and local happenings which make me think, inform me and often prompt a post or other sharing response.

Authorities toughen laws for Victorian drivers
Authorities toughen laws for Victorian drivers. Photo: Ken Robertson — The Age

But in today’s edition there is an article of mind numbing incompetence. Luckily for the writer, it is unattributed which probably means it was written by some PR hack with an axe to grind and has no place in the newspaper.

The first paragraph reads

Our mobile phone obsession has led authorities to toughen laws for Victorian drivers, amid fears texting and tweeting will lead to tragedy

Last time I checked “laws” are made by governments by way of parliament. Which “authorities” have the power to pass laws?

What fears? Who’s fears? It seems that in the world of The Age editors the unspecified fears of unidentified authorities are a sound basis for laws being made by unspecified institutions which profoundly affect their readers.

Remember too that the new laws will apply under a regime where you will be presumed guilty on the word of the reporting officer. And there is no room for degrees of guilt, even if you contest the charge in front of a magistrate. Thus, talking on a phone for 5 seconds while stopped in traffic is treated as the same offence as talking on the phone while travelling at 110 kph in heavy traffic – while it is raining.

And it gets worse. The article ends with this …

The changes will be submitted for approval this week.

Submitted to who?

And before wrapping up the following statement is made

Under the mobile phone crackdown, P-plate drivers will be banned from using their phones altogether.

Eh?

  • So non P-plate drivers can use their phones?
  • What if the car is stopped?
  • Turned off?
  • On a private driveway?
  • What if the device is an iPod or iPad – both can be used for messaging, or even for VOIP or video calls, but they are not phones

This is sloppy, lazy and irresponsible reporting in the extreme.

Just a couple of questions The Age might have posed to whoever issued the Press Release

  • what is the evidence that the current penalties have not deterred the antisocial behaviour?
  • what is the evidence that heavier penalties will have any impact on behaviour?
  • what are the justifications for a greater than 50% increase in the financial penalty?
  • why not a 40% increase? Or a 60% increase?
  • what evidence exists that drivers are breaking the current law?
  • if there is evidence that the law is being flouted, what is being done to enforce it?
  • who are the “authorities” increasing the penalties?
  • to whom are the authorities recommending the dramatic increase in penalties?
  • what are the views of independent experts on the recommendations?
  • how do the current and proposed penalties compare with those in other states?
  • what is the view of the Minister responsible for motoring laws?
  • what are the views of the appropriate shadow minister?

I could go on. In an age where Governments seem to be of the view that they operate in a vacuum, with no need to justify their actions, our only defence against incompetence, stupidity and entrenched party political beliefs is a strong and rigorous press.

In this instance The Age has let us, and themselves down. Badly.

Posted on

New Speed Camera Cash Grab by Victoria

Cash grab from speed cameras
Cash grab from speed cameras
Cash grab from speed cameras. Photo: Simon O’Dwyer – The Age

Covert Speed Cameras

The Victorian Government has announced that from last night speed camera operators can hide themselves, their cars and their equipment to catch speeding motorists. This is in addition to the fact that most of the camera equipped cars are unmarked. It also recognises the fact that the operators already do this anyway.

Remember too that many, if not most of the operators are in fact employed by corporations who are required to make a profit for their shareholders. Such profits arise from commission paid by the Government for each motorist entrapped by their equiplent.

To avoid outcry, the announcement made reference to the Commissioner for Speed Camera (Revenue) to attempt to appear “independent”. This is the same independent Commissioner who examined 116 complaints from the public about placement of cameras breaching the previous guidelines. He found in favour of the camera operator in every case. To be absolutely fair, he did find that the camera positions were in breach of the rules in 3 cases, but then decided that there were valid reasons for the breaches. He might be independent – but it’s a bit hard to see it!

Now for the funny part. The announcement then went on to claim that the move is required to protect mobile speed camera operators from “intimidation or threat in their workplace”. Official statistics reveal that none of the operators of the 100+ mobile cameras have actually been harmed in the course of their duties and that there have been a staggering 110 incidents where motorists have swerved towards the vehicle containing the operator and his gear. That’s about once in every 700 shifts.

In fact, given that nearly 85% of speeding tickets in Victoria are issued to drivers travelling less than 5 kph over the limit, coupled with the removal of restrictions on placing cameras at the bottom of hills, it would not be unreasonable to estimate that the additional annual revenue to the Government could be in exccess of $15 million.

Do you think it is reasonable to trust the decisions of a Government with such a vested interest in the outcome? I don’t.

And if you think I’m paranoid just remember that:

  • in NSW every speed camera is in full view and required to be signposted twice before you pass it; and
  • in South Australia the open road speed limit is 110 kph a full 10 kph higher than in Victoria

By the apparent standards of the Victorian Government politicians in those states must be little short of mass murderers. You and I both know that this is not so. The truth is that the Victorian Government is addicted to the revenue raised by its so called safety cameras. And it will use any means possible to protect that revenue.

Posted on

Reserve Bank of Australia – Cover Up

Reserve Bank of Australia – Cover Up

Reserve Bank of Australia - Cover Up
Reserve Bank of Australia – Cover Up

I have been following this story in The Age and have shared thoughts on the subject before.

But having just watched the Four Corners program on iView I am simply stunned to wonder just what the power brokers have to do before they are called to account. Clearly, being caught out as bare faced liars (as is the case of the RBA’s Glenn Stevens and his cronies) is not enough.

I have also made mention of the fact that the current head of ASIC (Greg Medcraft) bailed as Global Head of Securitisation at Société Générale to return to Australia to join ASIC. He left the plum New York job just before the GFC struck!

The US Federal Housing Finance Agency has alleged in a lawsuit that Societe Generale’s securitisation business – which Mr Medcraft oversaw – was negligent, did shoddy due diligence and seriously misled two American loan providers, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac
The Age – November 10, 2011

Medcraft continues to refuse to explain why ASIC has not even bothered to investigate claims of gross criminality by two independent whistleblowers against RBA directors and executives.

Anyway, next time ASIC throws its might and power at you threatening fines and worse if you don’t file their forms on time, seek comfort from the fact that the most powerful in the land can illegally throw millions at corrupt arms dealers and other criminals with impunity.

Posted on

Remember this?

I stumbled across this while checking some old emails. I am embarrassed to have to admit that I had forgotten the evil recently perpetrated by the ALP against our own disadvantaged. Shouldn't be surprised by the level of evil directed at refugees should we. Our politicians from both sides do not share the smallest measure of worth between them all. If you don't have a viable independent in your electorate, informal is the only moral option. Somehow we have to tell Rudd and Abbott that they STINK.

 

Posted on

Fun in Bomber Land

Shepard Fairey’s iconic Hope poster inspired this James Hird image. It also reminds me that the best part of the current footy scandal is watching the squirming of Melbourne's “finest” as they defend the indefensible and work out which mates to protect!

 

Posted on

Let the Lies Begin

HungerThe political lying will now reach fever pitch and will continue for another 33 days.

The only good news is that I am in the Melbourne electorate so I actually have a choice of voting informal or for Adam Bandt (Greens).

I could not even contemplate voting for a candidate supporting the MORONIC egomaniac Rudd or equally MORONIC “thick as three planks” Abbott.

They are both equally prepared to destroy helpless refugee men, women and children to grab power.

They are both ignoring the fact that the majority of Australians do not support their redneck refugee policies.

And both are perfectly comfortable buying power from the lunatic fringe who would still support the White Australia Policy of yesteryear if only someone would put it forward.

A Pox on both your houses.