<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>19Seven &#187; Pathetic Parliaments</title>
	<atom:link href="http://nigelball.org/category/trivia/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://nigelball.org</link>
	<description>by Nigel Ball...</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Jan 2012 21:48:04 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Pathetic Parliaments</title>
		<link>http://nigelball.org/2010/06/13/pathetic-parliaments</link>
		<comments>http://nigelball.org/2010/06/13/pathetic-parliaments#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jun 2010 11:05:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Ball</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Grumpy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soapbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trivia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[casino]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gamble]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[roulette]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nigelball.org/?p=210</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Casino Party from Yuri Arcurs WebsiteOur parliaments, and by implication, our politicians are pathetic!I have just discovered that by the Interactive Gambling Act 2001 our governments have ensured that Australians can only gamble in Australian venues. In other words, the &#8230; <a href="http://nigelball.org/2010/06/13/pathetic-parliaments">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nigelball.org/2010/06/13/pathetic-parliaments/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Is it unreasonable to expect telco gouging to be stopped?</title>
		<link>http://nigelball.org/2010/05/02/is-it-unreasonable-to-expect-telco-gouging-to-be-stopped</link>
		<comments>http://nigelball.org/2010/05/02/is-it-unreasonable-to-expect-telco-gouging-to-be-stopped#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 02 May 2010 09:43:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Ball</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Grumpy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soapbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trivia]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nigelball.org/?p=203</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A colleague, knowing that I had recently fallen foul of yet another telco for thousands of dollars of &#8220;excess usage charges&#8221;, sent me this link, presumably thinking it might make me feel better. Instead, it prompted me to recall that &#8230; <a href="http://nigelball.org/2010/05/02/is-it-unreasonable-to-expect-telco-gouging-to-be-stopped">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nigelball.org/2010/05/02/is-it-unreasonable-to-expect-telco-gouging-to-be-stopped/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Storm in a Teacup?</title>
		<link>http://nigelball.org/2010/04/23/storm-in-a-teacup</link>
		<comments>http://nigelball.org/2010/04/23/storm-in-a-teacup#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Apr 2010 05:02:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Ball</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Grumpy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scams]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soapbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trivia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nrl]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[scandal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[sport]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Storm]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nigelball.org/?p=192</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I know it is just a game, and I know I have more important things to do than post this blog entry. But, I can&#8217;t help wondering what it is that I am missing about the ginormous kerfuffle encompassing Victoria &#8230; <a href="http://nigelball.org/2010/04/23/storm-in-a-teacup">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nigelball.org/2010/04/23/storm-in-a-teacup/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SMH brings us the future</title>
		<link>http://nigelball.org/2009/12/31/smh-brings-us-the-future</link>
		<comments>http://nigelball.org/2009/12/31/smh-brings-us-the-future#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Dec 2009 08:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Ball</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trivia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news reporting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sydney Morning Herald]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nigelball.org/?p=179</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#8217;s about 7pm on New Year&#8217;s Eve so we have just 5 hours or so of 2009 left. But, Dylan Welch at the Sydney Morning Herald isn&#8217;t letting a small fact like that stop him from reporting that the Victorian &#8230; <a href="http://nigelball.org/2009/12/31/smh-brings-us-the-future">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nigelball.org/2009/12/31/smh-brings-us-the-future/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Do we really still need saints?</title>
		<link>http://nigelball.org/2009/12/20/mary-mackillop</link>
		<comments>http://nigelball.org/2009/12/20/mary-mackillop#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 10:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nigel Ball</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Grumpy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Humour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soapbox]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Trivia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mary MacKillop]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://nigelball.org/?p=175</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The following started as a short Facebook update after I satisfied myself that most tweets about Mary MacKillop were negative. But, it kept on growing so it&#8217;s ended up here&#8230; is pleased to report that a totally informal check of &#8230; <a href="http://nigelball.org/2009/12/20/mary-mackillop">Continue reading <span class="meta-nav">&#8594;</span></a>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://nigelball.org/2009/12/20/mary-mackillop/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

